Francis — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Sheldon Anthony Francis, Natoya Fiona Cunningham, and Jamahal Dubose v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross (Lawton Chiles, 1995); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2973
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Decisions
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sheldon Anthony Francis, Natoya Fiona Cunningham, and Jamahal Dubose appealed from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company was the appellee.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or explanation for its decision. Judges Gross, Levine, and Forst concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the matter appealed from the circuit court.
  • The opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying dispute or circuit court ruling.
  • The court issued no written analysis of the appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The opinion establishes only that the Fourth District affirmed. Because it contains no factual discussion or legal reasoning, it does not disclose the basis for the court’s decision.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top