Freeman v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Michael G. Freeman v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Nordby; Neff
Date Decided
September 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-2484
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Michael G. Freeman appealed from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge Jennie Kinsey presided.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues Freeman raised, or the parties’ appellate arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without analysis or an explanation of its reasoning. Judges Roberts, Nordby, and Neff concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

Because the opinion contains only an affirmance, it identifies the result but provides no stated rationale for the court’s decision.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top