French v. State — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Wilbur Eric French v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Kelly; Sleet; Rothstein-Youakim
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-1450
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Summary Affirmance, Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Wilbur Eric French appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Pat Siracusa presided. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain appeals from summary postconviction proceedings.

The opinion does not describe French’s underlying conviction, the relief he sought, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition without an explanatory opinion, so it announced no reasoning or broader legal rule. Judges Kelly, Sleet, and Rothstein-Youakim concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court provided no analysis, the opinion does not identify the factual or legal basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no written guidance on the substantive issues. Its practical significance is therefore principally limited to the parties and the disposition of French’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top