Friedman v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Michael Jeffrey Friedman v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Smith; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
September 29, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1647
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Michael Jeffrey Friedman appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2023-CF-004832-A-O. Circuit Judge Leticia Marques entered the decision under review.

The appellate opinion does not identify the charges, describe the proceedings below, or state the arguments Friedman raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without analysis, so the opinion provides no explanation of its reasoning and announces no express rule of law beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment against Friedman.
  • The decision was unanimous, with Judges Stargel, Smith, and Kamoutsas concurring.
  • Because the opinion contains no factual discussion or legal analysis, it does not disclose the issues presented or the grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact. Its broader significance is limited because the appellate court did not explain its reasoning or articulate a legal standard for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top