Fritzler v. Rakipi — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Gale G. Fritzler and Rhonda J. Fritzler v. Edmon Rakipi, Gulfije Zulbeari, Smith & Associates Title, Inc. d/b/a Luxe Title Services, Pete Mustafaraj, Smith & Associates Real Estate, Fidelity National Title of Florida, Inc., Yee Xiong, and Thu Anh Dang
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J. (Rick Scott, 2014); Northcutt, J. (Lawton Chiles Jr., 1997); Guard, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2026)
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1482
Topics
Civil Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gale G. Fritzler and Rhonda J. Fritzler appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Thane B. Covert presided. The appellees included individuals and businesses associated with real estate and title services.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments. Only appellee Thu Anh Dang appeared through counsel in the appeal; the remaining appellees made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the challenged judgment or order was left in place; it does not identify which legal arguments the panel accepted or rejected.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the Pinellas County Circuit Court’s decision.
  • The three-judge panel issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion supplies no factual account, legal analysis, or statement of the issues presented.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this appeal by leaving the circuit court’s decision intact. Because the panel gave no reasons, the opinion offers no substantive guidance for attorneys beyond the disposition of this particular case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top