Gamez-Gomez — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Roberto Gamez-Gomez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Makar, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); EISNAUGLE, J. (Rick Scott, 2017)
Date Decided
September 8, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3261
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Roberto Gamez-Gomez appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Lake County in lower-tribunal case number 2024-CF-002899-A. Circuit Judge Heidi Davis entered the decision under review.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, the underlying facts, the procedural arguments, or the issues Gamez-Gomez raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. The appellate court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the merits.

Chief Judge Jay and Judges Makar and Eisnaugle concurred. The opinion was subject to any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion identifies no legal rule or factual issue resolved on appeal.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive analysis for attorneys confronting similar issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top