Ghent v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Gary Renard Ghent, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); STARGEL, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); White, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2464
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gary Renard Ghent, Jr. appealed from the Circuit Court for Polk County, where Judge Cassandra L. Denmark presided over lower-tribunal case number 2016-CF-003543.

The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the charges, underlying facts, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or relief Ghent requested.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or deciding any identified legal question in a written analysis. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Stargel and White concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no factual or legal analysis supporting the affirmance.
  • The opinion identifies no specific issue resolved beyond the disposition of Ghent’s appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the Sixth District Court of Appeal unless further review or rehearing is available and pursued. Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top