Glover — affirmed the circuit court’s judgment without a written opinion

Case
Marcus D. Glover v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Winokur, J.; Treadwell, J.
Date Decided
October 23, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3270
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marcus D. Glover, proceeding pro se, appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Bradford County. Circuit Judge James Colaw entered the decision under review.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not identify the charges, describe the underlying facts, state the issues Glover raised, or specify the relief he sought. The State of Florida appeared as appellee.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Winokur and Treadwell concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed; it does not disclose the legal basis for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Bradford County circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was unanimous and issued per curiam.
  • The opinion contains no facts, analysis, or explanation of the issues decided.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact. Because the appellate court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal questions presented in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top