Gonzalez — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Adalberto Gonzalez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rothstein-Youakim; Smith; Guard
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0319
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Adalberto Gonzalez appealed a decision of the Hillsborough County Court. County Judge Matthew A. Smith had presided over the proceedings below.

The Second District’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the nature of the case, the arguments raised on appeal, or the county court’s reasoning. Gonzalez was represented on appeal by the public defender’s office, and the State was represented by the attorney general’s office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning and announced no express rule of law. Judges Rothstein-Youakim, Smith, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the county court’s decision.
  • The disposition was per curiam and contained no explanation of the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues presented or establish an express legal rule.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but offers no substantive analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top