Gonzalez v. Ho — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Danay Gonzalez v. Andy Ho
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
MAY (Jeb Bush, 2001); Gerber (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
August 6, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3338
Topics
Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Danay Gonzalez, proceeding without counsel, appealed from a decision of the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. County Judge Kathleen Mary McHugh presided over the lower-court case.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the appellate arguments. Andy Ho was represented on appeal by Alejandro L. Sixto of Sixto & Associates, P.A.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the county court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam disposition consisting only of the word “Affirmed.”

Because the court provided no written reasoning, the opinion establishes no stated rationale for the result and does not identify which arguments or legal principles controlled the appeal. Judges May, Gerber, and Shaw concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The Fourth District issued no explanation of its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, claims, or appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but offers attorneys no substantive analysis to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore primarily to the parties and the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top