Gough v. State — Fifth District affirmed the appeal without explanation

Case
William Gough v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); MAKAR (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
August 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2447
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

William Gough appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, where Circuit Judge R. Lee Smith presided. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, arguments, or ruling presented for review.

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal considered the matter under case number 5D2025-2447. Gough was represented by the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, and the State was represented by the Florida Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam opinion, the Fifth District affirmed the appeal. The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues.

Chief Judge Jay and Judges Makar and Kilbane concurred. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the appeal.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not identify the issue presented or the specific ruling under review.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal at the Fifth District without explaining the court’s reasoning. Because the opinion contains only an affirmance and no factual or legal analysis, it offers no express guidance on the substantive issues involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top