Grayson v. Ubl — Sixth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Alan Grayson v. Thomas Ubl
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; White; Brownlee
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-2502
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alan Grayson appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Orange County in litigation against Thomas Ubl. The underlying circuit-court case was assigned number 2020-CA-007854-O and was decided by Judge Eric J. Netcher.

The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the governing legal issues.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Wozniak, White, and Brownlee concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or explanation for its ruling. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed and does not announce a substantive legal holding.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County Circuit Court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying claims, appellate issues, or legal standards applied.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place as between Grayson and Ubl. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the law or the merits of the underlying dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top