Grover — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jasmine Grover v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Soud, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022); MacIver, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
October 29, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2839
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jasmine Grover appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Sumter County, where Judge Mary Pavloff Hatcher presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case number as 2021-CF-000010-A.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the facts, charges, procedural history, arguments on appeal, or specific ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the matter on appeal. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Soud and MacIver concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis and did not identify the grounds for affirmance. The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the matter under review.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a unanimous three-judge panel.
  • The opinion supplies no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the result.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Grover’s appeal in the State’s favor at the panel stage, subject to any authorized post-decision motion. Because the court issued only an unexplained affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the legal issues involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top