Hampton — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Shawn Casey Hampton v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J. (Rick Scott, 2014); Khouzam, J. (Charlie Crist, 2008); Morris, J. (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2001
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Shawn Casey Hampton appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for DeSoto County, where Judge Don T. Hall presided. The opinion does not identify the charges, sentence, issues raised on appeal, or underlying facts.

Hampton was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The Florida Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying explanation. The opinion therefore announces no legal reasoning or issue-specific holding beyond leaving the judgment intact.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment against Hampton remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning for its decision.
  • The opinion establishes no articulated rule concerning the unidentified issues raised in the appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Hampton’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Because the opinion does not disclose the facts or appellate arguments, its significance is limited to the disposition of this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top