Background
Matthew W. Hand appealed in a case involving the State of Florida. The appeal arose from the Circuit Court for Marion County, where Timothy McCourt was identified as the judge.
The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the ruling challenged on appeal, the arguments presented, or the legal issues before the court.
The Court’s Holding
The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed. The court issued its decision per curiam, with Chief Judge Jay and Judges Makar and Wallis concurring.
The opinion provides no reasoning or discussion of the governing law. It also states that the decision is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.
Key Takeaways
- The Fifth District affirmed the decision under review.
- The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
- The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate issues, or basis for affirmance.
Why It Matters
The decision resolves Hand’s appeal at the Fifth District, subject to any timely and authorized post-decision motion. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.