Hardy v. State — affirmed in a Rule 3.850 appeal

Case
Ralph Hardy v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Edwards; Soud; Boatwright
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2985
Topics
Criminal Law, Postconviction Proceedings, Rule 3.850
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ralph Hardy, proceeding without counsel, brought an appeal under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Seminole County. Circuit Judge Melissa D. Souto presided below.

The State of Florida made no appearance in the appeal. The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe Hardy’s claims, the underlying facts, or the substance of the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its disposition. Judges Edwards, Soud, and Boatwright concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed in Hardy’s Rule 3.850 appeal.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the claims raised or describe the circuit court’s ruling.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Hardy’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no reasoning or factual discussion. Its significance is therefore limited to the affirmance in this particular Rule 3.850 proceeding.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top