Background
Tristian Harmon appealed from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, where Judge Ramiro C. Areces presided. The appeal concerned lower-tribunal case numbers F05-36448-A, F06-3852, and F10-19786-A.
The opinion identifies the matter as an appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), but does not describe the circuit court’s ruling or the issues Harmon raised. Harmon represented himself, and the Florida Attorney General represented the State.
The Court’s Holding
The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
The per curiam opinion consists only of the word “Affirmed” and provides no reasoning, factual analysis, or discussion of the parties’ arguments.
Key Takeaways
- The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
- The court did not identify the specific ruling under review or explain its basis for affirmance.
- Judges Gordo, Bokor, and Rebull comprised the panel, which issued the decision per curiam.
Why It Matters
The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis for litigants or courts to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Harmon’s appeal on the record presented.