Harris v. State — Florida’s Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling

Case
Paul Monroe Harris v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gannam; Kamoutsas; Pratt
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0861
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Paul Monroe Harris appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Polk County, where Judge Michelle O. Pincket presided. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Harris represented himself. The State of Florida was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Chief Assistant Attorney General Marilyn Francis Muir.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam opinion consists only of the disposition “AFFIRMED” and does not state the court’s reasoning. Judges Gannam, Kamoutsas, and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal was brought under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion does not identify Harris’s claims or provide reasoning, it offers no explanation of how the court evaluated the issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top