Hassan — affirmed the county court without a written explanation

Case
Hanan Hassan v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Per Curiam
Date Decided
August 13, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0759
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Decision; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Hanan Hassan, representing herself, appealed from a judgment or order of the County Court for Hernando County in lower-tribunal case number 2024-SC-002766. County Judge Barbara-Jo Bell presided below.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC did not appear in the appeal. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues Hassan raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or statement of a broader rule.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court did not explain why it affirmed.
  • The opinion supplies no facts or legal analysis from which to derive a broader holding.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Portfolio Recovery Associates’ favor but offers no guidance beyond the result. Because the court did not identify the underlying issues or provide reasoning, the opinion should not be read as establishing a substantive rule on the dispute between the parties.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top