Hatcher v. State — Fourth DCA affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Julius Hatari Hatcher v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber, C.J.; Gross, J.; Ciklin, J.
Date Decided
August 27, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1390
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Julius Hatari Hatcher appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in Okeechobee County. Circuit Judge Lawrence Mirman presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 472000CF000368CFBXMX.

Hatcher represented himself on appeal. The State of Florida made no appearance. The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the underlying charges, procedural history, issues raised, or arguments presented.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Chief Judge Gerber and Judges Gross and Ciklin concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. The disposition therefore establishes only that the lower court’s decision was affirmed; it does not identify the grounds for affirmance or announce a legal rule.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The ruling was a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The disposition ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless altered through rehearing or further review. Because the court supplied no analysis, the opinion offers no explanation of how the panel evaluated Hatcher’s claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top