Henry — misdemeanor judgment affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Trinell Melvin Neville Henry v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
HARRIS (Rick Scott, 2018); Boatwright (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2688; 5D2025-3016
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Misdemeanor
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Trinell Melvin Neville Henry appealed from the County Court for Lake County, where Judge Emily Lauren Curington presided over the underlying misdemeanor case.

The appellate opinion does not describe the charge, the facts, Henry’s arguments, or the county court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Harris, Boatwright, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The Fifth District provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues raised on appeal.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized rehearing or related motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Henry’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top