Herrick v. Fitness International — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
KENNETH HERRICK v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC d/b/a LA FITNESS
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
NARDELLA (Ron DeSantis, 2023); WHITE (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0638
Topics
Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kenneth Herrick appealed from proceedings in the Circuit Court for Orange County involving Fitness International, LLC, doing business as LA Fitness. Circuit Judge Patricia L. Strowbridge presided below.

Herrick represented himself on appeal. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the ruling under review, the arguments raised, or the relevant facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed. The court issued its decision per curiam and provided no explanation or legal analysis.

Judges Nardella, White, and Smith concurred. Because the opinion does not identify the nature of the ruling under review, its affirmance should not be characterized more specifically.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the unidentified ruling under review.
  • The decision was per curiam and contained no reasoning or discussion of the issues.
  • The opinion supplies no facts or legal rule beyond the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Fitness International’s favor, but the opinion offers no guidance about the underlying dispute or the court’s reasoning. Its significance is therefore limited to the affirmance in this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top