Heyward v. Wells Fargo — Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision without explanation

Case
Joseph K. Heyward a/k/a Joseph Heyward and Mary Ann Heyward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Forst; Shepherd; Shaw
Date Decided
October 1, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1675
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joseph K. Heyward, also known as Joseph Heyward, and Mary Ann Heyward appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Christopher Pole presided over the lower-court case, docketed as No. 062018CA017279AXXXCE.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the relief sought, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the issues raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Forst, Shepherd, and Shaw concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate arguments or explain the basis for affirmance.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning that attorneys can apply to other cases. Its significance is therefore principally case-specific.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top