Higginbotham v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Adam Thomas Higginbotham v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Wozniak; Pratt
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0666
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Adam Thomas Higginbotham appealed from the Circuit Court for Orange County, where Circuit Judge Mark S. Blechman presided over the underlying criminal case.

The appellate opinion does not identify the conviction, sentence, issues raised, or facts underlying the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation, so the opinion states no legal reasoning or issue-specific holding. Judges Stargel, Wozniak, and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning for its decision.
  • The opinion does not disclose the arguments presented on appeal or establish an articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Higginbotham’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top