Holmes v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
John Holmes, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Atkinson; Smith
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2833
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

John Holmes, Jr., appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Circuit Judge Christopher LaBruzzo presided. The opinion does not identify Holmes’s conviction, sentence, claims, or the circuit court ruling under review.

Holmes represented himself on appeal. The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Cynthia Richards.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or addressing any legal issue. Judges Black, Atkinson, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no written reasoning for the affirmance.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, charges, or appellate arguments.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Holmes’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no substantive analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore primarily case-specific.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top