Hughes v. State — First District affirms without a written opinion

Case
Jessica Lynn Hughes v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Ray; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016)
Date Decided
October 19, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3306
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jessica Lynn Hughes appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County, where Judge Clifton Drake presided.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues Hughes raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or explanation of the legal grounds for affirmance. Judges Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but its lack of reasoning limits what attorneys can draw from it about the First District’s analysis of any legal or factual issue.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top