Hunter v. State — Second District affirms without explanation

Case
Ivery Dandrea Hunter v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Sleet; Labrit
Date Decided
October 2, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-1641
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ivery Dandrea Hunter appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Julie L. Sercus presided. The appeal proceeded pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Hunter represented himself. The brief opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam opinion consisting only of the disposition and supplied no reasoning or analysis. Judges Khouzam, Sleet, and Labrit concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The court did not explain the factual or legal basis for its decision.
  • Hunter proceeded pro se in the appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion provides no factual discussion or legal analysis, it offers no substantive guidance about the issues underlying the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top