Iunakova v. Ostrovskiy — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Olga Iunakova v. Stanislav Ostrovskiy
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Forst; Shepherd; Shaw
Date Decided
October 8, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3858
Topics
Appeals, Family Law, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Olga Iunakova appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Catalina Avalos presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062024DR019659AXXXCE.

Iunakova and appellee Stanislav Ostrovskiy each represented themselves on appeal. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged ruling, or the arguments raised by the parties.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision. Judges Forst, Shepherd, and Shaw concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. The opinion therefore establishes only that the challenged ruling was left in place, without identifying the grounds for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written legal analysis.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the appellee’s favor unless further proceedings, including a timely rehearing motion, alter the result. Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the underlying legal issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top