Ivery v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed the circuit court’s ruling

Case
Roderick James Ivery v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Black; Smith
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1309
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Pro Se Litigation, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Roderick James Ivery, proceeding without counsel, appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. Circuit Judge Philip James Federico entered the ruling under review.

The appeal proceeded pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The abbreviated opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the nature of Ivery’s claims, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued its decision per curiam and provided no explanation of its reasoning. Judges Khouzam, Black, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The appellate court did not discuss the facts, claims, or legal analysis underlying the appeal.
  • Ivery represented himself in the appellate proceeding.

Why It Matters

Because the opinion contains only an affirmance and no substantive analysis, it does not announce an articulated legal rule or explain how the court evaluated Ivery’s claims. Its direct effect is to leave the Pinellas County circuit court’s ruling undisturbed.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top