J.A.S. v. A.D.S. — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
In the Interest of O.D.S., a child, J.A.S. v. A.D.S. and J.D.S.
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
NORTHCUTT (Lawton Chiles, 1997); VILLANTI (Jeb Bush, 2003)
Date Decided
July 22, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0323
Topics
Family Law, Child Proceedings, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

J.A.S. appealed an order entered by the Circuit Court for Manatee County in a proceeding concerning O.D.S., a child. Circuit Judge Charles P. Sniffen entered the order under review.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the terms of the circuit court’s order, the arguments raised on appeal, or the factual record. A.D.S. and J.D.S. appeared as appellees.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s order.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion. It therefore announced no legal reasoning, addressed no issue expressly, and established no stated rule beyond leaving the challenged order in effect.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s order concerning O.D.S. remains in effect.
  • The Second District affirmed without discussing the facts, appellate arguments, or governing law.
  • Judges Northcutt, Villanti, and Morris concurred in the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in favor of A.D.S. and J.D.S. while providing no written guidance for other litigants or courts.

Because the opinion contains only a per curiam affirmance, no conclusions should be drawn from it about the panel’s reasoning or its view of any particular legal argument.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top