J.S.M. — First District affirmed the juvenile-court judgment without a written opinion

Case
J.S.M., a Child v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Bilbrey; Nordby
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0673
Topics
Juvenile Law; Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

J.S.M., a child, appealed from a judgment or order entered by the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Circuit Judge Coleman Lee Robinson presided below.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying allegations, the procedural history beyond the appeal, the issues J.S.M. raised, or the relief requested.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion states no legal reasoning and announces no express rule addressing the merits of J.S.M.’s arguments.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment or order remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or explanation for its decision.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless further review or an authorized post-decision motion changes the result. Because the court affirmed without an opinion, the decision offers practitioners no articulated reasoning on the underlying juvenile-law issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top