Jackson v. Jackson — affirmed the appealed circuit-court ruling without explanation

Case
Karen Lenorita Jackson v. Brian Dion Jackson
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; Morris; Atkinson
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-1251
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Karen Lenorita Jackson appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, where Judge Rochelle Curley presided. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.

Both Karen Jackson and Brian Dion Jackson represented themselves. The Second District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the specific order under review, or state the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Silberman, Morris, and Atkinson concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the appealed circuit-court ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate arguments, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top