Jackson v. State — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Joshua Jackson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
WALLIS; EISNAUGLE; MACIVER
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-2570
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Rule 3.800; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joshua Jackson appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County in a proceeding identified by the Fifth District Court of Appeal as a “3.800 Appeal.” Circuit Judge Meredith Charbula presided below.

Jackson was represented on appeal by Rachael E. Reese of Rachael Reese, P.A. The State of Florida made no appearance. The opinion provides no facts, arguments, or description of the specific circuit court ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision. Judges Wallis, Eisnaugle, and MacIver concurred.

The court issued no written analysis and did not identify the grounds for affirmance. The opinion also stated that it would not become final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the ruling under review in the Rule 3.800 appeal.
  • The decision contains no explanation of the facts, legal issues, or basis for affirmance.
  • Judges Wallis, Eisnaugle, and MacIver comprised the concurring panel.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no substantive reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Jackson’s appeal and the procedural fact of affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top