Jdaitawi — affirmed the human-relations ruling without explanation

Case
Gelnar Jdaitawi v. Due Amici Pizza Pasta Bar
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Black
Date Decided
October 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0786
Topics
Administrative Appeal; Human Relations; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gelnar Jdaitawi appealed a matter involving Due Amici Pizza Pasta Bar from the Florida Commission on Human Relations to Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal.

Jdaitawi represented himself on appeal. Due Amici was represented by Ryan J. Vatalaro of Atlas Law.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District affirmed the decision under review.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation, so the opinion does not identify the underlying claims, describe the commission’s ruling, or provide the court’s reasoning.

Key Takeaways

  • The Florida Commission on Human Relations matter was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no substantive analysis or statement of legal principles.
  • Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Black concurred in the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the commission’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore limited primarily to the parties and the disposition of this administrative appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top