Joazil — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jean Joazil and Ophina Joazil v. American Integrity Insurance Company of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Boatwright, J.; MacIver, J.
Date Decided
August 18, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-2585
Topics
Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jean Joazil and Ophina Joazil appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Duval County in a case involving American Integrity Insurance Company of Florida. Circuit Judge Robin E. Lanigan presided below.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the facts, the parties’ claims, the procedural history beyond the existence of the appeal, or the nature of the decision under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the appealed decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning, identified no legal issue, and announced no rule of law. The opinion states only “AFFIRMED,” with Chief Judge Jay and Judges Boatwright and MacIver concurring.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the decision appealed from the Duval County Circuit Court.
  • The per curiam opinion contains no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion does not identify the nature of the affirmed decision or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal at the Fifth District unless altered through an authorized post-decision motion or further review. Because the court gave no explanation, the opinion offers no stated reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top