Johnson v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Brian Scott Johnson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Edwards; Harris
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0676
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Brian Scott Johnson appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Sumter County in case number 2023-CF-001165-A. Circuit Judge Mary Pavloff Hatcher presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the proceedings in the circuit court, the issues Johnson raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or resolving any identified legal question in a written analysis. Judges Makar, Edwards, and Harris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment against Johnson remains affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion identifies Judges Makar, Edwards, and Harris as the participating panel members.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of Johnson’s appeal with an affirmance, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the underlying criminal case or the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top