Johnson v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Randy Michael Johnson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; LaRose; Guard
Date Decided
August 26, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1299
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Randy Michael Johnson appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for DeSoto County, where Judge Guy A. Flowers presided.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, or arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Silberman, LaRose, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • The opinion identifies Judges Silberman, LaRose, and Guard as the participating panel.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the appellate court did not explain its reasoning or identify the issues raised, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in Johnson’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top