Jones — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Arthur Jones v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Black; Smith
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-0360
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Summary Affirmance, Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Arthur Jones appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Philip James Federico presided. Jones represented himself, and the appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

The Second District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, Jones’s claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Khouzam, Black, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal was handled under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The opinion provides no factual discussion or legal analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning that attorneys can apply to other cases. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Jones’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top