Jones v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Travis Devon Jones, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; Treadwell; Neff
Date Decided
September 25, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0734
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Travis Devon Jones, Jr., proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Columbia County, where Circuit Judge Garrett Hill presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues Jones raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Bilbrey, Treadwell, and Neff concurred.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis, so the opinion establishes only that the judgment or order under review remained in effect. The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appellate court did not explain the factual or legal basis for its decision.
  • The participating panel consisted of Judges Bilbrey, Treadwell, and Neff.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless further authorized review changes the result. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion provides no substantive guidance about the underlying dispute or the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top