Juravin v. Global Cooling — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Don K. Juravin v. Global Cooling, LLC, Robert J. Mafes, Anna Juravin, Levia Juravin, and Ynes Juravin
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wallis; Boatwright; Kilbane
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
5D2023-3632
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Don K. Juravin appealed from proceedings in the Circuit Court for Lake County before Judge Dan R. Mosley. The appellees were Global Cooling, LLC, Robert J. Mafes, Anna Juravin, Levia Juravin, and Ynes Juravin.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning, addressed no specific legal issue, and announced no rule of law. Judges Wallis, Boatwright, and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s disposition.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not disclose the facts, appellate issues, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s disposition in place, subject to any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court supplied no analysis, the opinion offers no articulated legal reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top