Kennedy Trust v. Costello — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
The Machiel N. Kennedy 2007 Revocable Trust Dated December 4, 2007, et al. v. Laurie B. Costello, et al.
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Northcutt, J.; Silberman, J.
Date Decided
August 26, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0655
Topics
Trusts; Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The Machiel N. Kennedy 2007 Revocable Trust, the Machiel Kennedy Land Trust, and Jeffrey S. Kennedy appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. Jeffrey Kennedy appeared individually and in various trustee and beneficiary capacities.

The appellees were Laurie B. Costello and Kelly M. Kennedy Nelson, each individually and in beneficiary or trustee capacities associated with the trusts. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the appellants’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The court issued its decision per curiam, with Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Northcutt and Silberman concurring.

The opinion provides no reasoning, addresses no legal issue, and announces no rule beyond the disposition of this appeal. Accordingly, the circuit court’s ruling remains in effect, but the opinion does not disclose the basis for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the Pinellas County circuit court’s ruling.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying trust dispute or establish a stated legal rule.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the challenged circuit court ruling intact. Because the court supplied no factual discussion or legal analysis, the opinion offers no substantive guidance for attorneys handling future trust disputes.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top