Ketch v. Security First Insurance Company — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Tannis Ketch and Victor Ketch v. Security First Insurance Company
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaROSE; SLEET; ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM
Date Decided
October 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-3336
Topics
Appellate Review, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tannis Ketch and Victor Ketch appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Cheryl K. Thomas presided. Security First Insurance Company was the appellee.

The appellate opinion does not describe the facts, claims, procedural history, or specific ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or explanation for its disposition. Judges LaRose, Sleet, and Rothstein-Youakim concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts, claims, or grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal in Security First Insurance Company’s favor, while leaving the basis for the affirmance unstated. Because the opinion contains no legal analysis, it offers no articulated rule or reasoning for application beyond this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top