King v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Dameon Latrone King v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lambert; Edwards; Soud
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1605
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dameon Latrone King appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Duval County in lower-court case number 2024-CF-010014-A. Circuit Judge Mark Borello presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision does not describe the underlying charges, facts, arguments, or rulings challenged on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court issued no written analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Lambert, Edwards, and Soud concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment was affirmed.
  • The appellate court did not explain its reasoning or address any issue in a written opinion.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the judgment against King intact, but its lack of factual discussion or legal analysis limits its usefulness as guidance on any substantive or procedural issue raised in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top