King v. State — Fourth District affirmed the criminal judgment without a written opinion

Case
Daenon King v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Levine; Klingensmith; Caryn Siperstein, Associate Judge
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2105
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Daenon King appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Andrew L. Siegel presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062023CF008743A88810.

The appellate opinion does not describe the charges, facts, trial-court rulings, or arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Levine and Klingensmith and Associate Judge Caryn Siperstein concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place but offers no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top