Kostecka — Workers’ compensation ruling affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Gerald Kostecka Jr. v. North Port Retail Center / Florida Blue and Corvel Enterprise Comp/Tampa
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ray; Bilbrey; Kelsey
Date Decided
November 2, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0012
Topics
Workers’ Compensation; Per Curiam Affirmance; Appellate Review
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gerald Kostecka Jr. appealed a decision from Florida’s Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims involving North Port Retail Center / Florida Blue and Corvel Enterprise Comp/Tampa. The compensation-claims proceeding was before Judge Rita L. Young.

The opinion identifies October 14, 2024, as the date of accident. It does not describe the underlying injury, the claims presented, the compensation judge’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the decision below in a per curiam disposition.

Because the court issued only a one-word affirmance and provided no reasoning, the opinion does not announce a legal rule or explain the basis for rejecting Kostecka’s appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The decision of the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims was affirmed.
  • The three-judge panel concurred in the per curiam disposition.
  • The opinion provides no factual analysis, legal reasoning, or precedential explanation for the result.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the compensation judge’s decision intact, but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness to attorneys seeking guidance on substantive workers’ compensation law or appellate standards.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top