Kreisberg v. State — Third District affirmed the judgment without explanation

Case
Eric Kreisberg v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Fernandez; Gordo; Rebull
Date Decided
October 22, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-2230
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Eric Kreisberg appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, where Judge William Altfield presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as No. F24-25794.

The Third District’s opinion provides no facts about the underlying case, the ruling under review, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation, so the opinion states no legal reasoning and resolves no identified issue beyond leaving the lower court’s judgment in place. The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Fernandez, Gordo, and Rebull.
  • Because the opinion contains no facts or reasoning, it does not identify the appellate issues or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless altered through rehearing or further review. Its practical effect is to leave the circuit court’s judgment undisturbed.

Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on Florida law beyond the disposition of this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top