L.R. v. Department of Children and Families — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
L.R., Mother of V.A.S., Minor Child v. Department of Children and Families
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lambert; Harris; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0428
Topics
Dependency; Family Law; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

L.R., the mother of minor child V.A.S., appealed an order from the Circuit Court for Marion County in a proceeding involving the Florida Department of Children and Families. Circuit Judge Stacy Morris Youman entered the order under review.

L.R. represented herself on appeal. The Department and the statewide Guardian ad Litem Office appeared through counsel. The appellate opinion does not describe the challenged order, the underlying facts, or the arguments presented.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Lambert, Harris, and Boatwright concurred.

Because the court issued only the word “AFFIRMED,” it provided no legal analysis and identified no specific basis for its ruling. The circuit court’s order therefore remains in effect, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the Marion County circuit court’s order.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified panel judges.
  • The per curiam affirmance contains no facts, reasoning, or statement of a broader legal rule.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the Department-related proceeding unless further authorized review is timely pursued. Its practical effect is to leave the circuit court’s decision undisturbed.

Because the court supplied no written reasoning, the opinion offers practitioners no guidance about the substantive issues presented and should not be read as deciding questions beyond the result in this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top