Lamore — Florida Sixth DCA affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Donald Lamore v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
White; Smith; Pratt
Date Decided
August 25, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-0024
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Donald Lamore, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County, where Judge Shannon H. McFee presided over lower-tribunal case number 06-1185F.

The opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the challenged ruling, Lamore’s appellate arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no explanation for the affirmance and announced no rule of law. Judges White, Smith, and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The opinion does not disclose the facts, legal issues, or reasoning supporting the result.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a panel consisting of Judges White, Smith, and Pratt.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Lamore’s appeal by affirming the lower court, but its one-word disposition offers attorneys no substantive analysis of the underlying dispute and no stated legal rationale to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top