Background
Raymon Land appealed from the County Court for Citrus County, where Judge Bruce E. Carney presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as 2024-MM-000556-A.
The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the offense or judgment at issue, the arguments raised on appeal, or the county court’s reasoning.
The Court’s Holding
The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s judgment.
The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no legal analysis, addressed no specific appellate issue, and announced no express rule of law. Judges Makar, Edwards, and Eisnaugle concurred.
Key Takeaways
- The county court’s judgment was affirmed.
- The appellate court gave no explanation for its decision.
- The opinion does not disclose the facts, issues presented, or legal basis for affirmance.
Why It Matters
The decision ends this stage of Land’s appeal with the lower court’s judgment left in place, subject to any timely and authorized motion under the cited Florida appellate rules.
Because the opinion contains no reasoning or discussion of the issues, it offers no stated legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.