Leblanc-Moriniere v. Walt Disney Parks — Sixth District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Stephan Leblanc-Moriniere v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Mize; Gannam
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1133
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Stephan Leblanc-Moriniere appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Orange County in litigation against Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. Circuit Judge Eric J. Netcher presided in the lower tribunal.

The appellate opinion provides no facts about the dispute, identifies no claims or defenses, and does not describe the circuit court’s ruling or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis and cited no authority. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review was left in place; it does not disclose the panel’s rationale.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Stargel, Mize, and Gannam.
  • The opinion contains no factual discussion, legal analysis, or cited authority.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in Disney’s favor unless further review or rehearing changes the result, while leaving the lower court’s decision intact. Because the opinion does not explain its reasoning, it offers no substantive guidance about the underlying dispute or the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top